Executive Summary
Informations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | CVE-2024-56649 | First vendor Publication | 2024-12-27 |
Vendor | Cve | Last vendor Modification | 2025-01-06 |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3
Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | |||
---|---|---|---|
Overall CVSS Score | 5.5 | ||
Base Score | 5.5 | Environmental Score | 5.5 |
impact SubScore | 3.6 | Temporal Score | 5.5 |
Exploitabality Sub Score | 1.8 | ||
Attack Vector | Local | Attack Complexity | Low |
Privileges Required | Low | User Interaction | None |
Scope | Unchanged | Confidentiality Impact | None |
Integrity Impact | None | Availability Impact | High |
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2
Cvss vector : | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cvss Base Score | N/A | Attack Range | N/A |
Cvss Impact Score | N/A | Attack Complexity | N/A |
Cvss Expoit Score | N/A | Authentication | N/A |
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores |
Detail
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: Do not configure preemptible TCs if SIs do not support Both ENETC PF and VF drivers share enetc_setup_tc_mqprio() to configure MQPRIO. And enetc_setup_tc_mqprio() calls enetc_change_preemptible_tcs() to configure preemptible TCs. However, only PF is able to configure preemptible TCs. Because only PF has related registers, while VF does not have these registers. So for VF, its hw->port pointer is NULL. Therefore, VF will access an invalid pointer when accessing a non-existent register, which will cause a crash issue. The simplified log is as follows. root@ls1028ardb:~# tc qdisc add dev eno0vf0 parent root handle 100: \ mqprio num_tc 4 map 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 hw 1 [ 187.290775] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000001f00 [ 187.424831] pc : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400 [ 187.430518] lr : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x30c/0x400 [ 187.511140] Call trace: [ 187.513588] enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400 [ 187.518918] enetc_setup_tc_mqprio+0x180/0x214 [ 187.523374] enetc_vf_setup_tc+0x1c/0x30 [ 187.527306] mqprio_enable_offload+0x144/0x178 [ 187.531766] mqprio_init+0x3ec/0x668 [ 187.535351] qdisc_create+0x15c/0x488 [ 187.539023] tc_modify_qdisc+0x398/0x73c [ 187.542958] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x128/0x378 [ 187.547064] netlink_rcv_skb+0x60/0x130 [ 187.550910] rtnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x24 [ 187.554492] netlink_unicast+0x300/0x36c [ 187.558425] netlink_sendmsg+0x1a8/0x420 [ 187.606759] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- In addition, some PFs also do not support configuring preemptible TCs, such as eno1 and eno3 on LS1028A. It won't crash like it does for VFs, but we should prevent these PFs from accessing these unimplemented registers. |
Original Source
Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-56649 |
CWE : Common Weakness Enumeration
% | Id | Name |
---|---|---|
100 % | CWE-476 | NULL Pointer Dereference |
CPE : Common Platform Enumeration
Sources (Detail)
Alert History
Date | Informations |
---|---|
2025-07-15 02:41:12 |
|
2025-07-14 12:38:29 |
|
2025-06-26 02:38:27 |
|
2025-06-25 12:36:30 |
|
2025-06-24 02:43:05 |
|
2025-05-27 02:48:30 |
|
2025-03-29 03:44:24 |
|
2025-03-28 13:47:40 |
|
2025-03-28 03:22:12 |
|
2025-03-19 03:17:02 |
|
2025-03-18 03:30:01 |
|
2025-03-14 03:17:09 |
|
2025-03-06 14:13:41 |
|
2025-02-22 03:27:13 |
|
2025-01-08 00:20:57 |
|
2025-01-07 03:08:11 |
|
2025-01-07 00:20:49 |
|
2024-12-27 21:20:28 |
|