Executive Summary
Informations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | CVE-2024-42256 | First vendor Publication | 2024-08-08 |
Vendor | Cve | Last vendor Modification | 2024-09-06 |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3
Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | |||
---|---|---|---|
Overall CVSS Score | 9.8 | ||
Base Score | 9.8 | Environmental Score | 9.8 |
impact SubScore | 5.9 | Temporal Score | 9.8 |
Exploitabality Sub Score | 3.9 | ||
Attack Vector | Network | Attack Complexity | Low |
Privileges Required | None | User Interaction | None |
Scope | Unchanged | Confidentiality Impact | High |
Integrity Impact | High | Availability Impact | High |
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2
Cvss vector : | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cvss Base Score | N/A | Attack Range | N/A |
Cvss Impact Score | N/A | Attack Complexity | N/A |
Cvss Expoit Score | N/A | Authentication | N/A |
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores |
Detail
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry When a subrequest is marked for needing retry, netfs will call cifs_prepare_write() which will make cifs repick the server for the op before renegotiating credits; it then calls cifs_issue_write() which invokes smb2_async_writev() - which re-repicks the server. If a different server is then selected, this causes the increment of server->in_flight to happen against one record and the decrement to happen against another, leading to misaccounting. Fix this by just removing the repick code in smb2_async_writev(). As this is only called from netfslib-driven code, cifs_prepare_write() should always have been called first, and so server should never be NULL and the preparatory step is repeated in the event that we do a retry. The problem manifests as a warning looking something like: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs] Which may be triggered by a number of different xfstests running against an Azure server in multichannel mode. generic/249 seems the most repeatable, but generic/215, generic/249 and generic/308 may also show it. |
Original Source
Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-42256 |
CPE : Common Platform Enumeration
Sources (Detail)
Source | Url |
---|
Alert History
Date | Informations |
---|---|
2025-06-26 02:33:35 |
|
2025-06-25 12:32:34 |
|
2025-06-24 02:38:16 |
|
2025-05-27 02:42:39 |
|
2025-03-29 03:39:05 |
|
2025-03-28 13:43:56 |
|
2025-03-28 03:17:29 |
|
2025-03-19 03:12:52 |
|
2025-03-18 03:25:47 |
|
2025-03-14 03:13:06 |
|
2025-03-06 14:09:37 |
|
2025-02-22 03:23:08 |
|
2025-01-08 03:04:15 |
|
2025-01-07 03:03:48 |
|
2024-12-25 03:02:26 |
|
2024-12-12 03:05:22 |
|
2024-11-23 03:02:26 |
|
2024-11-22 03:00:37 |
|
2024-11-20 02:58:58 |
|
2024-11-14 02:59:16 |
|
2024-11-09 02:59:17 |
|
2024-10-26 02:56:41 |
|
2024-10-25 02:58:35 |
|
2024-10-23 02:57:48 |
|
2024-10-03 02:53:06 |
|
2024-10-02 02:51:30 |
|
2024-09-14 21:30:05 |
|
2024-09-11 21:27:55 |
|
2024-09-06 21:28:15 |
|
2024-09-06 17:27:36 |
|
2024-08-08 17:27:24 |
|
2024-08-08 13:27:30 |
|