Executive Summary

Informations
Name CVE-2023-5363 First vendor Publication 2023-10-25
Vendor Cve Last vendor Modification 2024-02-01

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3

Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Overall CVSS Score 7.5
Base Score 7.5 Environmental Score 7.5
impact SubScore 3.6 Temporal Score 7.5
Exploitabality Sub Score 3.9
 
Attack Vector Network Attack Complexity Low
Privileges Required None User Interaction None
Scope Unchanged Confidentiality Impact High
Integrity Impact None Availability Impact None
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2

Cvss vector :
Cvss Base Score N/A Attack Range N/A
Cvss Impact Score N/A Attack Complexity N/A
Cvss Expoit Score N/A Authentication N/A
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores

Detail

Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.

Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.

When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.

For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.

Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.

Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.

The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.

OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.

Original Source

Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-5363

CPE : Common Platform Enumeration

TypeDescriptionCount
Application 426
Os 1

Sources (Detail)

https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0003/
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0004/
Source Url
MISC http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/24/1
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0df40630850fb274...
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5f69f5c65e483928...
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0010/
https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5532
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231024.txt

Alert History

If you want to see full details history, please login or register.
0
1
2
3
4
5
Date Informations
2024-03-01 13:39:06
  • Multiple Updates
2024-02-01 21:28:13
  • Multiple Updates
2024-02-01 12:31:32
  • Multiple Updates
2023-11-09 17:27:46
  • Multiple Updates
2023-10-27 21:27:23
  • Multiple Updates
2023-10-26 00:27:21
  • First insertion