This CPE summary could be partial or incomplete. Please contact us for a detailed listing.

Summary

Detail
Vendor Openssl First view 2015-05-20
Product Openssl Last view 2021-03-25
Version 1.0.2c Type Application
Update *  
Edition *  
Language *  
Sofware Edition *  
Target Software *  
Target Hardware *  
Other *  
 
CPE Product cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl

Activity : Overall

Related : CVE

This CPE have more than 25 Relations. If you want to see a complete summary for this CPE, please contact us.
  Date Alert Description
7.4 2021-03-25 CVE-2021-3450

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).

5.9 2021-03-25 CVE-2021-3449

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).

5.9 2021-02-16 CVE-2021-23841

The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

7.5 2021-02-16 CVE-2021-23840

Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

3.7 2021-02-16 CVE-2021-23839

OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x).

5.9 2020-12-08 CVE-2020-1971

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).

3.7 2020-09-09 CVE-2020-1968

The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have used a Diffie-Hellman (DH) based ciphersuite. In such a case this would result in the attacker being able to eavesdrop on all encrypted communications sent over that TLS connection. The attack can only be exploited if an implementation re-uses a DH secret across multiple TLS connections. Note that this issue only impacts DH ciphersuites and not ECDH ciphersuites. This issue affects OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable to this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2w (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2v).

7.5 2020-04-21 CVE-2020-1967

Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f).

9.1 2020-02-27 CVE-2020-7043

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL before 1.0.2. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because hostname comparisons do not consider '\0' characters, as demonstrated by a good.example.com\x00evil.example.com attack.

5.3 2020-02-27 CVE-2020-7042

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because the hostname check operates on uninitialized memory. The outcome is that a valid certificate is never accepted (only a malformed certificate may be accepted).

5.3 2020-02-27 CVE-2020-7041

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because an X509_check_host negative error code is interpreted as a successful return value.

5.3 2019-12-06 CVE-2019-1551

There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).

3.7 2019-09-10 CVE-2019-1563

In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

5.3 2019-09-10 CVE-2019-1549

OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).

4.7 2019-09-10 CVE-2019-1547

Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

3.3 2019-07-30 CVE-2019-1552

OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory is most commonly referred to as OPENSSLDIR, and is configurable with the --prefix / --openssldir configuration options. For OpenSSL versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the mingw configuration targets assume that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default prefix for program installation as well as for OPENSSLDIR should be '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are Windows programs, and as such, find themselves looking at sub-directories of 'C:/usr/local', which may be world writable, which enables untrusted users to modify OpenSSL's default configuration, insert CA certificates, modify (or even replace) existing engine modules, etc. For OpenSSL 1.0.2, '/usr/local/ssl' is used as default for OPENSSLDIR on all Unix and Windows targets, including Visual C builds. However, some build instructions for the diverse Windows targets on 1.0.2 encourage you to specify your own --prefix. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1, 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

7.4 2019-03-06 CVE-2019-1543

ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. It is a requirement of using this cipher that nonce values are unique. Messages encrypted using a reused nonce value are susceptible to serious confidentiality and integrity attacks. If an application changes the default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes and then makes a change to the leading bytes of the nonce expecting the new value to be a new unique nonce then such an application could inadvertently encrypt messages with a reused nonce. Additionally the ignored bytes in a long nonce are not covered by the integrity guarantee of this cipher. Any application that relies on the integrity of these ignored leading bytes of a long nonce may be further affected. Any OpenSSL internal use of this cipher, including in SSL/TLS, is safe because no such use sets such a long nonce value. However user applications that use this cipher directly and set a non-default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes may be vulnerable. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.0 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1c (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1b). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0k (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0j).

5.9 2019-02-27 CVE-2019-1559

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).

4.7 2018-11-15 CVE-2018-5407

Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.

5.9 2018-10-30 CVE-2018-0734

The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).

5.9 2018-10-29 CVE-2018-0735

The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1).

7.5 2018-06-12 CVE-2018-0732

During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o).

5.9 2018-04-16 CVE-2018-0737

The OpenSSL RSA Key generation algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a cache timing side channel attack. An attacker with sufficient access to mount cache timing attacks during the RSA key generation process could recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2o).

6.5 2018-03-27 CVE-2018-0739

Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition (such as can be found in PKCS7) could eventually exceed the stack given malicious input with excessive recursion. This could result in a Denial Of Service attack. There are no such structures used within SSL/TLS that come from untrusted sources so this is considered safe. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0h (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0g). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2o (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2n).

5.9 2018-03-27 CVE-2018-0733

Because of an implementation bug the PA-RISC CRYPTO_memcmp function is effectively reduced to only comparing the least significant bit of each byte. This allows an attacker to forge messages that would be considered as authenticated in an amount of tries lower than that guaranteed by the security claims of the scheme. The module can only be compiled by the HP-UX assembler, so that only HP-UX PA-RISC targets are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0h (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0g).

CWE : Common Weakness Enumeration

%idName
18% (12) CWE-200 Information Exposure
7% (5) CWE-327 Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
7% (5) CWE-295 Certificate Issues
6% (4) CWE-399 Resource Management Errors
6% (4) CWE-310 Cryptographic Issues
6% (4) CWE-189 Numeric Errors
6% (4) CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
6% (4) CWE-119 Failure to Constrain Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
4% (3) CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
4% (3) CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference
4% (3) CWE-203 Information Exposure Through Discrepancy
4% (3) CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
3% (2) CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values
3% (2) CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength
3% (2) CWE-320 Key Management Errors
1% (1) CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion
1% (1) CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion')
1% (1) CWE-254 Security Features
1% (1) CWE-20 Improper Input Validation

Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM)

id Description
2015-A-0203 Multiple Cisco Products Certificate Forgery Vulnerability
Severity: Category I - VMSKEY: V0061345
2015-A-0158 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Oracle Java SE
Severity: Category I - VMSKEY: V0061089
2015-A-0144 OpenSSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability
Severity: Category I - VMSKEY: V0061067

Snort® IPS/IDS

This CPE have more than 25 Relations. If you want to see a complete summary for this CPE, please contact us.
Date Description
2018-05-24 X.509 IPAddressFamily extension buffer overread attempt
RuleID : 46418 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 2
2018-05-24 X.509 IPAddressFamily extension buffer overread attempt
RuleID : 46417 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-12-29 OpenSSL SSLv3 warning denial of service attempt
RuleID : 40843 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 3
2016-11-08 OpenSSL OCSP Status Request Extension denial of service attempt
RuleID : 40360 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 3
2016-10-18 SSH weak blowfish cipher suite use attempt
RuleID : 40190 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-10-18 SSH weak 3DES cipher suite use attempt
RuleID : 40189 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-10-18 SSL weak 3DES cipher suite use attempt
RuleID : 40188 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-10-18 SSL weak 3DES cipher suite use attempt
RuleID : 40187 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-10-18 SSL weak 3DES cipher suite use attempt
RuleID : 40186 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-04-05 SSLv2 Client Hello attempt
RuleID : 38060 - Type : POLICY-OTHER - Revision : 4
2016-03-14 OpenSSL invalid RSASSA-PSS certificate denial of service attempt
RuleID : 37155 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 2
2016-03-14 OpenSSL invalid RSASSA-PSS certificate denial of service attempt
RuleID : 37154 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 2
2015-08-20 OpenSSL alternative chains certificate forgery attempt
RuleID : 35307 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 2
2015-08-11 OpenSSL anomalous x509 certificate with default org name and certificate chai...
RuleID : 35111 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33806 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33805 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33804 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33803 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33802 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL request for export grade ciphersuite attempt
RuleID : 33801 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 5
2015-04-14 SSL export grade ciphersuite server negotiation attempt
RuleID : 33800 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 6
2015-04-14 SSL export grade ciphersuite server negotiation attempt
RuleID : 33799 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 6
2015-04-14 SSL export grade ciphersuite server negotiation attempt
RuleID : 33798 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 6
2015-04-14 SSL export grade ciphersuite server negotiation attempt
RuleID : 33797 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 6
2015-04-14 SSL export grade ciphersuite server negotiation attempt
RuleID : 33796 - Type : SERVER-OTHER - Revision : 6

Nessus® Vulnerability Scanner

This CPE have more than 25 Relations. If you want to see a complete summary for this CPE, please contact us.
id Description
2019-01-18 Name: The remote Fedora host is missing a security update.
File: fedora_2019-a8ffcff7ee.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-17 Name: The remote database server is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.
File: mysql_5_6_43.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-17 Name: The remote database server is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.
File: mysql_5_7_25.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-17 Name: The remote database server is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.
File: mysql_8_0_14.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-11 Name: The remote device is missing a vendor-supplied security patch.
File: juniper_jsa10919.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-08 Name: The remote EulerOS host is missing multiple security updates.
File: EulerOS_SA-2019-1009.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-03 Name: The remote Fedora host is missing a security update.
File: fedora_2018-2f696a3be3.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-03 Name: The remote Fedora host is missing a security update.
File: fedora_2018-49651b2236.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-03 Name: The remote Fedora host is missing a security update.
File: fedora_2018-520e4c5b4e.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-03 Name: The remote Fedora host is missing a security update.
File: fedora_2018-9d667bdff8.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-02 Name: Tenable Nessus running on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabili...
File: nessus_tns_2018_16.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2019-01-02 Name: Tenable Nessus running on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabili...
File: nessus_tns_2018_17.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-28 Name: The remote EulerOS host is missing multiple security updates.
File: EulerOS_SA-2018-1420.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-28 Name: The remote EulerOS host is missing a security update.
File: EulerOS_SA-2018-1434.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-28 Name: Node.js - JavaScript run-time environment is affected by multiple vulnerabili...
File: nodejs_2018_nov.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-21 Name: An infrastructure management application running on the remote host is affect...
File: ibm_tem_9_5_10.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-20 Name: The remote Debian host is missing a security-related update.
File: debian_DSA-4355.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-10 Name: The remote EulerOS host is missing multiple security updates.
File: EulerOS_SA-2018-1392.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-10 Name: The remote FreeBSD host is missing one or more security-related updates.
File: freebsd_pkg_2a86f45afc3c11e8a41400155d006b02.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-07 Name: The remote Amazon Linux AMI host is missing a security update.
File: ala_ALAS-2018-1102.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-12-01 Name: The remote Debian host is missing a security-related update.
File: debian_DSA-4348.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-11-29 Name: The remote Gentoo host is missing one or more security-related patches.
File: gentoo_GLSA-201811-21.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-11-23 Name: The remote Slackware host is missing a security update.
File: Slackware_SSA_2018-325-01.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-11-23 Name: The remote Debian host is missing a security update.
File: debian_DLA-1586.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO
2018-11-21 Name: The remote EulerOS Virtualization host is missing a security update.
File: EulerOS_SA-2018-1379.nasl - Type: ACT_GATHER_INFO