Assigning instead of Comparing |
Weakness ID: 481 (Weakness Variant) | Status: Draft |
Description Summary
Extended Description
In many languages the compare statement is very close in appearance to the assignment statement and are often confused. This bug is generally the result of a typo and usually causes obvious problems with program execution. If the comparison is in an if statement, the if statement will usually evaluate the value of the right-hand side of the predicate.
Example 1
The following C/C++ and C# examples attempt to validate an int input parameter against the integer value 100. However, the expression to be evaluated in the if statement uses the assignment operator "=" rather than the comparison operator "==". The result of using the assignment operator instead of the comparison operator causes the int variable to be reassigned locally and the expression in the if statement will always evaluate to the value on the right hand side of the expression. This will result in the input value not being properly validated, which can cause unexpected results.
Example 2
In this example, we show how assigning instead of comparing can impact code when values are being passed by reference instead of by value. Consider a scenario in which a string is being processed from user input. Assume the string has already been formatted such that different user inputs are concatenated with the colon character. When the processString function is called, the test for the colon character will result in an insertion of the colon character instead, adding new input separators. Since the string was passed by reference, the data sentinels will be inserted in the original string (CWE-464), and further processing of the inputs will be altered, possibly malformed..
Example 3
The following Java example attempts to perform some processing based on the boolean value of the input parameter. However, the expression to be evaluated in the if statement uses the assignment operator "=" rather than the comparison operator "==". As with the previous examples, the variable will be reassigned locally and the expression in the if statement will evaluate to true and unintended processing may occur.
While most Java compilers will catch the use of an assignment operator when a comparison operator is required, for boolean variables in Java the use of the assignment operator within an expression is allowed. If possible, try to avoid using comparison operators on boolean variables in java. Instead, let the values of the variables stand for themselves, as in the following code.
Alternatively, to test for false, just use the boolean NOT operator.
Example 4
Pre-design: Through Build: Many IDEs and static analysis products will detect this problem. |
Phase: Implementation Place constants on the left. If one attempts to assign a constant with a variable, the compiler will of course produce an error. |
Nature | Type | ID | Name | View(s) this relationship pertains to![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChildOf | ![]() | 480 | Use of Incorrect Operator | Development Concepts699 Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 569 | Expression Issues | Development Concepts (primary)699 |
CanPrecede | ![]() | 697 | Insufficient Comparison | Research Concepts1000 |
Submissions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Submission Date | Submitter | Organization | Source | |
CLASP | Externally Mined | |||
Modifications | ||||
Modification Date | Modifier | Organization | Source | |
2008-07-01 | Eric Dalci | Cigital | External | |
updated Time of Introduction | ||||
2008-09-08 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Applicable Platforms, Description, Relationships, Other Notes, Taxonomy Mappings | ||||
2009-05-27 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Demonstrative Examples | ||||
2009-07-27 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Description, Other Notes |