N/A - CVE-2022-49783

Executive Summary

Informations
Name	CVE-2022-49783	First vendor Publication	2025-05-01
Vendor	Cve	Last vendor Modification	2025-05-02

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3

Cvss vector : N/A
Overall CVSS Score	NA
Base Score	NA	Environmental Score	NA
impact SubScore	NA	Temporal Score	NA
Exploitabality Sub Score	NA

Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2

Cvss vector :
Cvss Base Score	N/A	Attack Range	N/A
Cvss Impact Score	N/A	Attack Complexity	N/A
Cvss Expoit Score	N/A	Authentication	N/A
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores

Detail

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/fpu: Drop fpregs lock before inheriting FPU permissions

Mike Galbraith reported the following against an old fork of preempt-rt but the same issue also applies to the current preempt-rt tree.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: systemd
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
Preemption disabled at:
fpu_clone
CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G E (unreleased)
Call Trace:

dump_stack_lvl
? fpu_clone
__might_resched
rt_spin_lock
fpu_clone
? copy_thread
? copy_process
? shmem_alloc_inode
? kmem_cache_alloc
? kernel_clone
? __do_sys_clone
? do_syscall_64
? __x64_sys_rt_sigprocmask
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
? do_syscall_64
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
? do_syscall_64
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode
? do_syscall_64
? exc_page_fault
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

Mike says:

The splat comes from fpu_inherit_perms() being called under fpregs_lock(),
and us reaching the spin_lock_irq() therein due to fpu_state_size_dynamic()
returning true despite static key __fpu_state_size_dynamic having never
been enabled.

Mike's assessment looks correct. fpregs_lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel disables preemption so calling spin_lock_irq() in fpu_inherit_perms() is unsafe. This problem exists since commit

9e798e9aa14c ("x86/fpu: Prepare fpu_clone() for dynamically enabled features").

Even though the original bug report should not have enabled the paths at all, the bug still exists.

fpregs_lock is necessary when editing the FPU registers or a task's FP state but it is not necessary for fpu_inherit_perms(). The only write of any FP state in fpu_inherit_perms() is for the new child which is not running yet and cannot context switch or be borrowed by a kernel thread yet. Hence, fpregs_lock is not protecting anything in the new child until clone() completes and can be dropped earlier. The siglock still needs to be acquired by fpu_inherit_perms() as the read of the parent's permissions has to be serialised.

[ bp: Cleanup splat. ]