Missing SecurityDatabase\Encrypt\Encryption of Sensitive Data |
Weakness ID: 311 (Weakness Base) | Status: Draft |
Description Summary
Extended Description
The lack of proper data encryption passes up the guarantees of confidentiality, integrity, and accountability that properly implemented encryption conveys.
Scope | Effect |
---|---|
Confidentiality | If the application does not use a secure channel, such as SSL, to exchange sensitive information, it is possible for an attacker with access to the network traffic to sniff packets from the connection and uncover the data. This attack is not technically difficult, but does require physical access to some portion of the network over which the sensitive data travels. This access is usually somewhere near where the user is connected to the network (such as a colleague on the company network) but can be anywhere along the path from the user to the end server. |
Confidentiality Integrity | Omitting the use of encryption in any program which transfers data over a network of any kind should be considered on par with delivering the data sent to each user on the local networks of both the sender and receiver. Worse, this omission allows for the injection of data into a stream of communication between two parties -- with no means for the victims to separate valid data from invalid. In this day of widespread network attacks and password collection sniffers, it is an unnecessary risk to omit encryption from the design of any system which might benefit from it. |
Manual Analysis The characterizaton of sensitive data often requires domain-specific understanding, so manual methods are useful. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints. Black box methods may produce artifacts (e.g. stored data or unencrypted network transfer) that require manual evaluation. Effectiveness: High |
Automated Analysis Automated measurement of the entropy of an input/output source may indicate the use or lack of encryption, but human analysis is still required to distinguish intentionally-unencrypted data (e.g. metadata) from sensitive data. |
Example 1
The following code attempts to establish a connection, read in a password, then store it to a buffer.
While successful, the program fails to encrypt the data before writing it to a buffer, possibly exposing it to unauthorized actors.
Example 2
The following code attempts to establish a connection to a site to communicate sensitive information.
Though a connection is successfully made, the connection is unencrypted and it is possible that all sensitive data sent to or received from the server will be read by unintended actors.
Reference | Description |
---|---|
CVE-2009-2272 | password and username stored in cleartext in a cookie |
CVE-2009-1466 | password stored in cleartext in a file with insecure permissions |
CVE-2009-0152 | chat program disables SSL in some circumstances even when the user says to use SSL. |
CVE-2009-1603 | Chain: product uses an incorrect public exponent when generating an RSA key, which effectively disables the encryption |
CVE-2009-0964 | storage of unencrypted passwords in a database |
CVE-2008-6157 | storage of unencrypted passwords in a database |
CVE-2008-6828 | product stores a password in cleartext in memory |
CVE-2008-1567 | storage of a secret key in cleartext in a temporary file |
CVE-2008-0174 | SCADA product uses HTTP Basic Authentication, which is not encrypted |
CVE-2007-5778 | login credentials stored unencrypted in a registry key |
CVE-2002-1949 | Passwords transmitted in cleartext. |
CVE-2008-4122 | Chain: failure to set "secure" flag in HTTPS cookie causes it to be transmitted across unencrypted HTTP. |
CVE-2008-3289 | Product sends password hash in cleartext in violation of intended policy. |
CVE-2008-4390 | Remote management feature sends sensitive information including passwords in cleartext. |
CVE-2007-5626 | Backup routine sends password in cleartext in email. |
CVE-2004-1852 | Product transmits Blowfish encryption key in cleartext. |
CVE-2008-0374 | Printer sends configuration information, including administrative password, in cleartext. |
CVE-2007-4961 | Chain: cleartext transmission of the MD5 hash of password enables attacks against a server that is susceptible to replay (CWE-294). |
CVE-2007-4786 | Product sends passwords in cleartext to a log server. |
CVE-2005-3140 | Product sends file with cleartext passwords in e-mail message intended for diagnostic purposes. |
Phase: Requirements Clearly specify which data or resources are valuable enough that they should be protected by encryption. Require that any transmission or storage of this data/resource should use well-vetted encryption algorithms. |
Phase: Architecture and Design Using threat modeling or other techniques, assume that your data can be compromised through a separate vulnerability or weakness, and determine where encryption will be most effective. Ensure that data you believe should be private is not being inadvertently exposed using weaknesses such as insecure permissions (CWE-732). |
Phase: Architecture and Design Ensure that encryption is properly integrated into the system design, including but not necessarily limited to:
Identify the separate needs and contexts for encryption:
|
Phase: Architecture and Design Do not develop your own cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If your algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. |
Phase: Architecture and Design Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and select well-tested implementations. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. Periodically ensure that you aren't using obsolete cryptography. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms which were once regarded as strong. |
Phase: Architecture and Design Compartmentalize your system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. |
Phases: Implementation; Architecture and Design When you use industry-approved techniques, you need to use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks. |
Phase: Implementation Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible. This makes it easier to spot places in the code where data is being used that is unencrypted. |
Nature | Type | ID | Name | View(s) this relationship pertains to![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChildOf | ![]() | 310 | Cryptographic Issues | Development Concepts (primary)699 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 693 | Protection Mechanism Failure | Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 719 | OWASP Top Ten 2007 Category A8 - Insecure Cryptographic Storage | Weaknesses in OWASP Top Ten (2007) (primary)629 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 720 | OWASP Top Ten 2007 Category A9 - Insecure Communications | Weaknesses in OWASP Top Ten (2007)629 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 729 | OWASP Top Ten 2004 Category A8 - Insecure Storage | Weaknesses in OWASP Top Ten (2004) (primary)711 |
ChildOf | ![]() | 803 | 2010 Top 25 - Porous Defenses | Weaknesses in the 2010 CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors (primary)800 |
ParentOf | ![]() | 312 | Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information | Development Concepts (primary)699 Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
ParentOf | ![]() | 319 | Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information | Development Concepts (primary)699 Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
ParentOf | ![]() | 614 | Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute | Development Concepts (primary)699 Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
PeerOf | ![]() | 327 | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm | Research Concepts1000 |
Mapped Taxonomy Name | Node ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
---|---|---|---|
CLASP | Failure to encrypt data | ||
OWASP Top Ten 2007 | A8 | CWE More Specific | Insecure Cryptographic Storage |
OWASP Top Ten 2007 | A9 | CWE More Specific | Insecure Communications |
OWASP Top Ten 2004 | A8 | CWE More Specific | Insecure Storage |
WASC | 4 | Insufficient Transport Layer Protection |
[REF-11] M. Howard and D. LeBlanc. "Writing Secure Code". Chapter 9, "Protecting Secret Data" Page 299. 2nd Edition. Microsoft. 2002. |
[REF-17] Michael Howard, David LeBlanc and John Viega. "24 Deadly Sins of Software Security". "Sin 17: Failure to Protect Stored Data." Page 253. McGraw-Hill. 2010. |
Submissions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Submission Date | Submitter | Organization | Source | |
CLASP | Externally Mined | |||
Modifications | ||||
Modification Date | Modifier | Organization | Source | |
2008-07-01 | Eric Dalci | Cigital | External | |
updated Time of Introduction | ||||
2008-08-15 | Veracode | External | ||
Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping | ||||
2008-09-08 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Common Consequences, Relationships, Other Notes, Taxonomy Mappings | ||||
2009-10-29 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Common Consequences, Other Notes | ||||
Previous Entry Names | ||||
Change Date | Previous Entry Name | |||
2008-04-11 | Failure to Encrypt Data | |||