Failure to Sanitize Null Byte or NUL Character |
Weakness ID: 158 (Weakness Variant) | Status: Incomplete |
Description Summary
Extended Description
As data is parsed, an injected NUL character or null byte may cause the process to take unexpected actions that result in an attack.
Reference | Description |
---|---|
CVE-2005-2008 | Source code disclosure using trailing null. |
CVE-2005-3293 | Source code disclosure using trailing null. |
CVE-2005-2061 | Trailing null allows file include. |
CVE-2002-1774 | Null character in MIME header allows detection bypass. |
CVE-2000-0149 | |
CVE-2000-0671 | |
CVE-2001-0738 | |
CVE-2001-1140 | web server allows source code for executable programs to be read via a null character (%00) at the end of a request. |
CVE-2002-1031 | Protection mechanism for limiting file access can be bypassed using a null character (%00) at the end of the directory name. |
CVE-2002-1025 | |
CVE-2003-0768 | XSS protection mechanism only checks for sequences with an alphabetical character following a (<), so a non-alphabetical or null character (%00) following a < may be processed. |
CVE-2004-0189 | Decoding function in proxy allows regular expression bypass in ACLs via URLs with null characters. |
CVE-2005-3153 | Null byte bypasses PHP regexp check (interaction error). |
CVE-2005-4155 | Null byte bypasses PHP regexp check (interaction error). |
Developers should anticipate that null characters or null bytes will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their software system. Use an appropriate combination of black lists and white lists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. |
Phase: Architecture and Design Assume all input is malicious. Use a standard input validation mechanism to validate all input for length, type, syntax, and business rules before accepting the data to be displayed or stored. Use an "accept known good" validation strategy. |
Use and specify a strong output encoding (such as ISO 8859-1 or UTF 8). |
Do not rely exclusively on blacklist validation to detect malicious input or to encode output. There are too many variants to encode a character; you're likely to miss some variants. |
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated. Make sure that your application does not decode the same input twice. Such errors could be used to bypass whitelist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. |
Nature | Type | ID | Name | View(s) this relationship pertains to![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChildOf | ![]() | 138 | Improper Sanitization of Special Elements | Development Concepts (primary)699 Research Concepts (primary)1000 |
This can be a factor in multiple interpretation errors, other interaction errors, filename equivalence, etc. |
Mapped Taxonomy Name | Node ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
---|---|---|---|
PLOVER | Null Character / Null Byte | ||
WASC | 28 | Null Byte Injection |
Submissions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Submission Date | Submitter | Organization | Source | |
PLOVER | Externally Mined | |||
Modifications | ||||
Modification Date | Modifier | Organization | Source | |
2008-07-01 | Eric Dalci | Cigital | External | |
updated Potential Mitigations | ||||
2008-09-08 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Relationships, Relationship Notes, Taxonomy Mappings | ||||
2008-10-14 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Description | ||||
2008-11-24 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Observed Examples | ||||
2009-07-27 | CWE Content Team | MITRE | Internal | |
updated Potential Mitigations | ||||
Previous Entry Names | ||||
Change Date | Previous Entry Name | |||
2008-01-30 | Null Character / Null Byte | |||
2008-04-11 | Failure to Remove Null Character / Null Byte | |||