Analog In-band Switching Signals (aka Blue Boxing) |
Attack Pattern ID: 5 (Detailed Attack Pattern Completeness: Complete) | Typical Severity: Very High | Status: Draft |
Analog In-band Switching Signals (aka Blue Boxing) |
Attack Pattern ID: 5 (Detailed Attack Pattern Completeness: Complete) | Typical Severity: Very High | Status: Draft |
Summary
This attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. The signal is sent by the attacker to impersonate a supervisor signal. This has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line and call. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing.
Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authentication for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are hisotrical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
Description
Attacker identifies a vulnerable CCITT-5 phone line, and sends a combination tone to the switch in order to request administrative access. Based on tone and timing parameters the request is verified for access to the switch. Once the attacker has gained control of the switch launching calls, routing calls, and a whole host of opportunities are available.
Skill or Knowledge Level: Low
Given a vulnerable phone system, the attacker's technical vector relies on attacks that are well documented in cracker 'zines and have been around for decades.
CCITT-5 or other vulnerable lines, with the ability to send tones such as combined 2,400 Hz and 2,600 Hz tones to the switch
Implementation: Upgrade phone lines. Note this may be prohibitively expensive
Use strong access control such as two factor access control for adminsitrative access to the switch
CWE-ID | Weakness Name | Weakness Relationship Type |
---|---|---|
264 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls | Targeted |
Nature | Type | ID | Name | Description | View(s) this relationship pertains to![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChildOf | ![]() | 152 | Injection (Injecting Control Plane content through the Data Plane) | Mechanism of Attack (primary)1000 |
Submissions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Submitter | Organization | Date | ||
G. Hoglund and G. McGraw. Exploiting Software: How to Break Code. Addison-Wesley, February 2004. | Cigital, Inc | 2007-01-01 |
Modifications | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Modifier | Organization | Date | Comments | ||
Gunnar Peterson | Cigital, Inc | 2007-02-28 | Fleshed out content to CAPEC schema from the original descriptions in "Exploiting Software" | ||
Sean Barnum | Cigital, Inc | 2007-03-09 | Review and revise |
Security-Database help your corporation foresee and avoid any security risks that may impact your IT infrastructure and business applications.