Executive Summary

Informations
Name CVE-2021-47300 First vendor Publication 2024-05-21
Vendor Cve Last vendor Modification 2024-12-26

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3

Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Overall CVSS Score 5.5
Base Score 5.5 Environmental Score 5.5
impact SubScore 3.6 Temporal Score 5.5
Exploitabality Sub Score 1.8
 
Attack Vector Local Attack Complexity Low
Privileges Required Low User Interaction None
Scope Unchanged Confidentiality Impact None
Integrity Impact None Availability Impact High
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2

Cvss vector :
Cvss Base Score N/A Attack Range N/A
Cvss Impact Score N/A Attack Complexity N/A
Cvss Expoit Score N/A Authentication N/A
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores

Detail

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix tail_call_reachable rejection for interpreter when jit failed

During testing of f263a81451c1 ("bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free") under various failure conditions, for example, when jit_subprogs() fails and tries to clean up the program to be run under the interpreter, we ran into the following freeze:

[...]
#127/8 tailcall_bpf2bpf_3:FAIL
[...]
[ 92.041251] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ___bpf_prog_run+0x1b9d/0x2e20
[ 92.042408] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800da67f68 by task test_progs/682
[ 92.043707]
[ 92.044030] CPU: 1 PID: 682 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G O 5.13.0-53301-ge6c08cb33a30-dirty #87
[ 92.045542] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 92.046785] Call Trace:
[ 92.047171] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.047773] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0
[ 92.048389] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.049019] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[...] // few hundred [similar] lines more
[ 92.659025] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.659845] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.660738] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0
[ 92.661528] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.662378] ? print_usage_bug+0x50/0x50
[ 92.663221] ? print_usage_bug+0x50/0x50
[ 92.664077] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x9c/0xe0
[ 92.664887] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.665624] ? kernel_text_address+0xf5/0x100
[ 92.666529] ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
[ 92.667725] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50
[ 92.668854] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x15d4/0x2e20
[ 92.670185] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.671130] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.672020] ? __bpf_prog_run_args32+0x8b/0xb0
[ 92.672860] ? __bpf_prog_run_args64+0xc0/0xc0
[ 92.675159] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.677074] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
[ 92.678662] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x15d4/0x2e20
[ 92.680046] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.681285] ? __bpf_prog_run32+0x6b/0x90
[ 92.682601] ? __bpf_prog_run64+0x90/0x90
[ 92.683636] ? lock_downgrade+0x370/0x370
[ 92.684647] ? mark_held_locks+0x44/0x90
[ 92.685652] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.686752] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100
[ 92.688004] ? ktime_get+0x117/0x130
[ 92.688573] ? __cant_migrate+0x2b/0x80
[ 92.689192] ? bpf_test_run+0x2f4/0x510
[ 92.689869] ? bpf_test_timer_continue+0x1c0/0x1c0
[ 92.690856] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x90/0x90
[ 92.691506] ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x61/0x80
[ 92.692128] ? eth_type_trans+0x128/0x240
[ 92.692737] ? __build_skb+0x46/0x50
[ 92.693252] ? bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x65e/0xc50
[ 92.693954] ? bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0x2d0/0x2d0
[ 92.694639] ? __fget_light+0xa1/0x100
[ 92.695162] ? bpf_prog_inc+0x23/0x30
[ 92.695685] ? __sys_bpf+0xb40/0x2c80
[ 92.696324] ? bpf_link_get_from_fd+0x90/0x90
[ 92.697150] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90
[ 92.698007] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x124/0x220
[ 92.699045] ? finish_task_switch+0xe6/0x370
[ 92.700072] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100
[ 92.701233] ? finish_task_switch+0x11d/0x370
[ 92.702264] ? __switch_to+0x2c0/0x740
[ 92.703148] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90
[ 92.704155] ? __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x50
[ 92.705146] ? do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[ 92.706953] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[...]

Turns out that the program rejection from e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") is buggy since env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable is never true. Commit ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") added a tracker into check_max_stack_depth() which propagates the tail_call_reachable condition throughout the subprograms. This info is then assigned to the subprogram's ---truncated---

Original Source

Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-47300

CWE : Common Weakness Enumeration

% Id Name
100 % CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read

CPE : Common Platform Enumeration

TypeDescriptionCount
Application 6
Os 3470

Sources (Detail)

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39f1735c8107ef43a53c4daf82f330d880488d8f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd0a6b8582ffbfa88351949d50eccd5b6694ade
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbb086074dab631ac43f8645cbac1d7b148e05c4
Source Url

Alert History

If you want to see full details history, please login or register.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Date Informations
2025-06-26 01:52:21
  • Multiple Updates
2025-06-25 12:16:34
  • Multiple Updates
2025-06-24 01:56:50
  • Multiple Updates
2025-03-29 02:57:40
  • Multiple Updates
2025-03-28 13:28:03
  • Multiple Updates
2025-03-28 02:42:32
  • Multiple Updates
2025-03-18 02:50:19
  • Multiple Updates
2025-03-14 02:40:22
  • Multiple Updates
2025-01-08 02:34:59
  • Multiple Updates
2025-01-07 02:34:35
  • Multiple Updates
2024-12-27 00:20:49
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-25 09:25:28
  • Multiple Updates
2024-05-21 21:27:26
  • First insertion